Carbon dating of the shroud of Chat shag usa personal ads
" In a presentation on May 11, 1995, Thomas D'Muhala, former president of STURP, referred to a scientist who conducted a pre-1988 dating test on the Shroud as "Jerry Wasserberg".
It should be noted that the web site I just linked contains a transcript written by somebody who videotaped D'Muhala's presentation. So, the spelling of the scientist's name can't be attributed to D'Muhala.
For example: "[John] Heller took me back to the train station that evening [in 1984], and as we sat waiting for my train back to New York City, he told me in strictest confidence about a secret C-14 run that had already been made on a thread from the Shroud. Given the unofficial nature of the test, there would have been a lot of potential for ambiguities, changes in plans, and the gradual learning of details over time, for example. figure originate as a rough approximation, a good rounded figure to cite? Evans and Company, 2005], approximate Kindle location 5093; Robert Wilcox, The Truth About The Shroud Of Turin [Washington, DC: Regnery, 2010], approximate Kindle location 1744; Mark Oxley, The Challenge Of The Shroud [England: Author House, 2010], approximate Kindle location 4274). Here are some of the reasons why: - I made a couple of attempts to get a copy of the tape in which Adler allegedly identifies Rossman.
He said it had been done by the Livermore Laboratory in California, and the thread was cut into two segments. There may have been some back-and-forth over the years among the parties involved, with misconceptions persisting in one person's mind while they were corrected in another person's thinking. Did Case see Adler commenting on the issue in some other context? I also tried to get somebody who has the tape to play it for me over the phone. However, I did discuss the tape with two people who had heard it.
- Secondly, it's unlikely that he'd say that he didn't want to discuss the matter any further just after confessing.
While people sometimes do things that had seemed unlikely, and the scenario Benford described might have occurred, we're being asked to accept a sequence of events that's improbable upfront.
For an illustration of how ambiguous the differences in the accounts can be, see Thomas Case's 1994 interview with Heller and Adler (The Shroud Of Turin And The C-14 Dating Fiasco [Cincinnati, Ohio: White Horse Press, 1998], 32-3, 74-5). It seems, then, that Adler identified the individual as Jerry Wasserman.
Two times, Case asks questions based on the assumption that the two ends of the thread dated to 200 A. As we'll see below, there's somebody who comes much closer to meeting Adler's description than Rossman does, so there's no need to speculate that Rossman was being called Jerry, that Adler mispronounced Rossman's last name, etc.
I can name some of the sources for my information below, but there are other sources I can't name for various reasons. In this case, there are some factors involved that help explain how poorly the story has been preserved.If other people could correct or expand on what I've said here, I hope they'll do so. He did not know what margin of error there was on the dates, and thought it would be quite wide, as the test was only intended to give a rough idea of what an eventual C-14 date would look like. (This test in California was later confirmed to me by [Alan] Adler, who said that he was in fact the one who had arranged it, despite C-14 dating being specifically forbidden in STURP's agreement with the Turin Archdiocese.)" (William Meacham, The Rape Of The Turin Shroud [Lulu, 2005], 58) To give the reader some idea of how the accounts differ, it will sometimes be claimed that the second end of the thread dated to about 1200 A. For example, the people and facilities involved in the testing could be affiliated with more than one university. For the background to the claim that George Rossman was involved, see here.There seems to be widespread agreement, among the accounts circulating, that this dating test on the Shroud took place in the early 1980s (my sense is that the large majority say 1982) in California, involving one thread from the Shroud near the area of the 1988 carbon dating, producing two dates differing by several centuries for each end of the thread, one date being close to the time of Jesus and one several centuries later. As William Meacham mentioned in an email to me, it's "Not unusual for someone to send a sample to a colleague at another university or facility to analyze, if the person with the sample doesn't have the equipment for the desired test." There's also the issue of how much the people who did the testing told the people who submitted the sample, as well as when they provided the information. I've seen the Rossman allegation repeated in a few books (Frederick Zugibe, The Crucifixion Of Jesus [New York, New York: M.- Though the other two names I'll discuss below were circulating in the 1990s and earlier, I haven't found any evidence that anybody was naming Rossman prior to 2002.The people I've talked to, including some from STURP, either didn't hear anybody named as the scientist who conducted the 1982 test or heard of somebody other than Rossman.
Search for carbon dating of the shroud of:
Or perhaps one person had a significantly better memory than another. From the interview itself, you'd think both Heller and Adler agreed with the dating cited by Case. Both told me that the last name of the scientist identified by Adler sounded like "Wasserman".